Saturday, May 4, 2013

Mod 16 Reflection Blog


1. What were you expectations for this course and where they met?

My initial expectation was to learn more about the visual arts in general.  I had little to no exposure to art in the past.  This course did result in me obtaining more knowledge of art and artists.  My expectations were simple from the beginning and they were met.

2. Now that you've been through this course, What is art? How would you define it now compared to your intial posting?

In my initial posting I did not know the definition of what art was so I used a common definition.  It stated Art is the humanistic expression of concepts and ideas.  It is defined as the expression of creativity.  My current definition of art is still the same.  My definition of art is the same but my understanding of it has now expanded due to this course. 
   
3. Who was your favorite artist in your original posting and who is your favorite visual artist now? If there is a difference, why do you think so? If you have the same favorite artist, why do you think so?

My favorite artist in my initial post was MC Escher.  Now I do not have a favorite artist.  My visit to the Albright Knox showed me there are many more types and styles of art I enjoy.  I think I appreciate all art and have many favorites now not just one artist. 

4. Now that you've completed this course, how do you feel about taking an online course? Is your answer the same as it was in your first posting? How is it the same or different?

I had taken online courses before this one because they work with my schedule.  This one was different than all the rest.  It was structured in a way that caused the student to have to complete certain tests or projects on particular days.  It also required the student to go places with in time frames.  The videos took many hours to watch.  I am not complaining but for me it was hard to adhere to the requirements of the course because of all the deadlines and work load.  I would not recommend it for working adults with children as myself.  It is better suited for full time students who do not have other obligations.       

Friday, May 3, 2013

Mod 15 Criticism Blog

Mod 15 Critique Blog

1. Which projects did you review?

I reviewed the following projects:

“The Unique Qualities of Women Captured in Art” by Elena Kueker

“A Dog’s Eye View” by  by Arendas

“The Beauty of a City” by Brandon Martens

2. Why did you select the Exhibit you critiqued?

I selected “The Unique Qualities of Women Captured in Art” by Elena Kueker to critique.  This was my choice for two reasons.  First, I thought the curator had a well planned theme that I wanted to learn more about.  Second, I thought the images that were selected had value both as art and as historical documents.  I felt critiquing this exhibit would be a learning experience for me.


3. What challenges did you face in writing the critique article and how did you overcome them?

The biggest challenge I had was the suggestion portion.  I felt the curator did a good solid job on the project.  I did not want my suggestions for improvement to take away from it.  I overcame this be discussing the positives about the exhibit while giving an objective and constructive approach to my suggestions.

4. How do you feel about critiquing your peers work?

I felt it helped me to critique my own work.  I found myself wondering what others would have to say about my project.  I think it made me pay more attention to the details both in the reviewed exhibit and my own work.  I hope I did not hurt any feelings with my opinions.  I attempted to help the curator as best I could with my limited experience in this area.    

5. Would you like to read the critique your peers wrote about your Art Curation Project?

Yes I would like to read them.  It is always an eye opener to hear the views of a peer.  I think it allows one to become more proficient and capable in the area.  I am not sure how I would like to here bad or negative criticism.  I hope I would still be able to grow from it.

6. On a scale of 1-10 how would you rate your finished article and why?
 
I would rate my article a seven out of ten.  I put a good deal of effort into it but I admit I lack experience in this area.  I think that if I continuously critiqued art for many years then I would be really good at it.  This is not something I can be great at overnight. 

7. Did you enjoy working on this project?

This was not my favorite project of the semester but I did enjoy it.  The only hold up is the fact I may take the wind out of some ones sail with my comments.  I made a real effort to say what I felt while considering the curators experience level.  I wanted my critique to be helpful. 

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Mod 15 Video Blog


Mod 15 Video Blog

1. For each video list/discuss the key concepts you learned.

Video #1:  Greenberg on Art Criticism: An Interview by T. J. Clark

This video is an interview with Clement Greenberg.  The interviewer is T.J. Clark.  Greenberg is discussing artistic criticism.  He states that the best criticism he has seen is based on music.  He says art criticism is much harder to do.  Personal preferences can dominate the criticism and it is hard to keep them out.  Political and cultural back grounds can intrude on the attempt to make an objective analysis.  Greenberg talks about how he has overcome his own prejudices and how good art can come from anywhere.  He also states that some of the best art has been abstract art.     

Video #2:  Greenberg on Pollock: An Interview by T. J. Clark

This video is an interview with Clement Greenberg.  The interviewer is T.J. Clark.  Greenberg is discussing the artist Jackson Pollock.  Greenberg discusses Pollock’s progression from 1945 until his death.  He discusses Pollock’s transition from easel paintings to wall paintings or murals.  The techniques of the paintings were also described.  Drip/splatter, finger painting, un-stretched canvases, and “cutting” were all stylistic of Jackson Pollock.  The video also covers the personal struggles of Pollock including his alcoholism.      

2. Do the videos relate to the creation of your Art Criticism project? If yes, explain how. If no, explain why not.

Video #1:  Greenberg on Art Criticism: An Interview by T. J. Clark

Seeing Greenberg discuss how his own prejudices had to be overcome in order to give objective art criticism gave me some insight on how to approach this project.  He seemed to have a great deal of experience in the area of art criticism and I listened to some of the things he discussed.  I think one of the most important things he said is to keep an open mind at all times. 

Video #2:  Greenberg on Pollock: An Interview by T. J. Clark

The entire video was basically a critique and analysis of an artist’s work.  This helped me to see how a professional would see and artist’s works.  How they would describe them.  How they would discuss the good and the bad.  I was able gain a better understanding of Pollock through Greenberg’s analysis.  I will try to do the same in my project. 

3. What is your opinion of the films? Do they add depth to understanding of art criticism?

Video #1:  Greenberg on Art Criticism: An Interview by T. J. Clark

It was different to see someone smoking in a video.  This has become taboo in our culture.  It shows the age of the film.  Greenberg had a lot of opinions on the subject of art criticism.  Some I agree with and some I do not.  I had a bit of difficulty at times figuring out exactly what he was trying to say.  He sort of spoke in abstract terms.  I was however able to apply some of the things he said and therefore it helped me to view this video.

Video #2:  Greenberg on Pollock: An Interview by T. J. Clark

This video was 26 minutes of art criticism.  Most all aspects of Pollock’s work was analyzed.  This allowed me to better understand two things.  First, I understand Pollock as an artist better now.  Second, I see how a good critic knows both art and the artist.  I think it would take a long time to become a good art critic after viewing this video.  I have a good idea now of how it is done.   

 

 

Mod 15 Self Portrait


Inspirational Image #1


Self-Portrait in Profile

Marcel Duchamp (American (born France), Blanville 1887–1968 Neuilly-sur-Seine)
Date:  1957

Medium:  Torn and pasted paper on velvet covered paperboard

Dimensions:  13 1/4 x 9 5/8 in. (33.7 x 24.4 cm)
 

  

Inspirational Image #2



Self-Portrait
Andy Warhol (American, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 1928–1987 New York)
Date:  1986

Medium:  Acrylic and silkscreen on canvas

Dimensions:  80 x 80in. (203.2 x 203.2cm) 81 x 81 x 2 in. (205.7 x 205.7 x 5.1 cm) (Frame)


 
Inspirational Image #3



[Portrait/Self-Portrait with Speed Graphic Camera]
Gordon H. Coster (American, Baltimore, Maryland 1906–1988)

Date:  ca. 1932

Medium:  Gelatin silver print

Dimensions:  36.8 x 30.8 cm (14 1/2 x 12 1/8 in.)

http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/190017205

 
Self-Photo



Self Portrait

 
1. Why did you select the inspiration pieces?

The inspirational images I selected were not typical painted images.  Each one was unique and different.  I wanted to create my image with my computer since this was an Internet based class.  These examples seemed like they aligned with a multimedia approach.

2. Why did you select the media to create your self-portrait?

I choose to use my computer because this class is Internet and computer based.  I have been creating projects all semester in other media such as paint or graphite.  I wanted to finally use my computer for a project and this one allowed me to do so. 

3. What challenges did you face in creating your self-portrait and how did you overcome them?

I never modified a picture like this before.  I used software on my laptop to adjust tint, sharpness, color, brightness, highlights, saturation, and temperature.  The combination of these resulted in the portrait you see.  I spent a good deal of time adjusting all these elements until I got what I wanted.  I also removed the Nike symbol from my hat.  I did not want to include any corporate images. 

4. How does this piece represent you?

You will see you can’t actually see my whole face.  This was done on purpose.  I am a bit old school.  I do not use Facebook, Twitter, or and social media sites.  I do not typically upload my pictures to the Internet.  I am a bit cautious of what might become of them.  The fact that a part of my face is blocked represents this aspect of me. 

5. What elements and principles of art did you apply in this work?

I used color, emphasis, and unity in this piece.  I stripped all real color out of the picture and left only lights and darks.  The edges of my outline are emphasized creating a hard contrast against the background.  The tones generally mingle with each other throughout the piece which creates unity. 

6. Did you enjoy working on this project?

Yes I did enjoy this project.  It gave me an opportunity to utilize my computer to create art.  We learned about digital media in this course and now I got a chance to apply it.  My family thought the picture came out good as well. 

7. What do you think of your final artwork?

The final work is a good representation of the inspirational images that I choose.  I was amazed how many different types of self-portraits there were out there.  I liked making my own because it gave me the opportunity to explore digitally enhancing software.  I had never done this before and I will use it again in the future. 

Mod 13/14 Video Blog


Questions and Topics for Your Blog Posting:

1. For each video list/discuss the key concepts you learned.

Video #1: The Lowdown on Lowbrow: West Coast Pop Art

This video focused on the Lowbrow art scene.  The video begins by trying to define Lowbrow.  The video claims Lowbrow is a type of surrealism that can’t be associated with any existing artistic category.  It is a new modern type of art that is basically anything the artist wants to incorporate.  They almost discuss it as a lifestyle rather than an artistic style.    
 
Video #2: Displaying Modern Art: The Tate Approach

This video deals with the display of art.  Primarily it discussed the Tate approach.   This was the exhibition display style of Henry Tate. The traditional display of art by chronological order was used set aside in Tate’s displays.  He utilized a thematic approach to his artistic displays. 

Video #3: Bones of Contention: Native American Archaeology

This video discusses the remains of Native American Indians.  Specifically the video discusses the bones.  Initially the bones were collected as a curiosity and then moved on into scientific analysis.  The controversy is centered on the fact the Native American bones are collected for study while bones of other nationalities are generally reburied when found. 

Video #4: An Acquiring Mind: Philippe de Montebello and The Metropolitan Museum of Art

 This video documents Philippe de Montebello and his tenure as the director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.  He was the eighth and longest tenured director of the museum.  The video thoroughly describes the process a work of art goes through to make it into an exhibit in the museum.  The scrutiny is quite profound and many people are involved.  The video encapsulates the director’s views and the general operation of the museum.

2. Do the videos relate to the creation of your Art Exhibition project? If yes, explain how. If no, explain why not.

Video #1: The Lowdown on Lowbrow: West Coast Pop Art

The Lowbrow art had many examples that were out of the ordinary.  This was consistent with my project.  I wanted to show art that was out of the ordinary and the Lowbrow scene also had art that does not comply with typical scenes. 

Video #2: Displaying Modern Art: The Tate Approach

This video has a direct connection to the creation of my project.  The video spends a good deal of time discussing thematic displays of art.  This is how my project was set up.  The works in my project were from various time periods but all of them had a connection through a theme. 

Video #3: Bones of Contention: Native American Archaeology

There are no real solid connections between this video and my project.  I can make some loose associations between this video and my exhibition.  The video deals with cultural norms and practices.  This theme runs through archeology as well as artistic studies.  What is expected and the way cultural items are treated is something that permeates all areas of society. 

Video #4: An Acquiring Mind: Philippe de Montebello and The Metropolitan Museum of Art

 This video had good information that paralleled well with the creation of my exhibition project.  The video shows exactly how Philippe de Montebello and the museum chooses which art work they will acquire.  The objectivity is one of the most important concepts in the process.  They show how they do not let personal taste affect the decision making process.  This was also a key concept I used when making decisions on the art works that would be a part of my project. 

3. What is your opinion of the films? Do they add depth to understanding of the art concepts you practiced while creating your curation project?

Video #1: The Lowdown on Lowbrow: West Coast Pop Art

This video was a bit faster paced and modern than some of the others.  It was easy to watch and kept my interest well.  This video had several examples of exhibition type art displays.  The artists also discussed the concepts and purpose of this type of art. 

Video #2: Displaying Modern Art: The Tate Approach

This film was a good example of how thematic exhibitions were set up.  This is exactly what I needed to accomplish in my project.  The video had information I could apply directly to my project.  For this reason I felt the video was a good additional source for me to use. 

Video #3: Bones of Contention: Native American Archaeology

This video gave me information I did not really know about the collection of Native American bones.  It was clear that native bones were not treated the same as non-native bones.  It almost seemed discriminatory.  I was glad to see some justice was served and some bones were returned.

Video #4: An Acquiring Mind: Philippe de Montebello and The Metropolitan Museum of Art

This video was a good example of the steps needed to choose a work of art objectively.  I think this was a good template to follow when deciding on the art works that went into my project.  The video was made well. It kept a constant flow of information and coupled that with many examples of people’s personal perspectives. 

 

 

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Curator Exhibition Slideshow Reflection


§I set out to create an exhibit that offered art that does not comply with the ordinary.  I wanted to show pieces that broke away from reality and had content that could only exist in our minds.  I viewed many more works than the ones that made it into my exhibit.  This allowed me to specifically choose ones that defied reality and made the viewer contemplate the content thoroughly.  I feel I was able to accomplish this.  The second visit to the museum to analyze an exhibit allowed me to see how this is done in the real world.  I applied some of the techniques I saw in this project.  The process in creating this PowerPoint exhibit was a new experience to me.  I have been exposed to a great deal of art in this class.  Processing it into projects like this is a good use of the knowledge that was gained.   

Sunday, April 21, 2013

Mod 11 Visit #2 Ehibit Analysis


 

Module #11 Art Gallery Visit #2 Exhibit Analysis

Questions about the exhibit:

1. What is the title of the exhibit?





2. What is the theme of the exhibition?

The theme of this exhibition is comprised of both sound and video.  The artist Kelly Richardson uses projectors to show looping video on screen panels.  The video is displayed on screens.  Some are shown on single screen panels and some are on three screen panel displays.  Each work is a video accompanied by sound but each one has a different theme.  I choose the three works which were the largest.  The themes were planets, forests, and swamps.

Step 2: The Gallery

Questions about the physical space:

1. What type of lighting is used?

The lighting in the rooms that the video was displayed was mainly provided by the video screens themselves.  There was additional accent lighting provided by pot lights mounted to the ceilings.  The general lighting in all the works with in the exhibit was minimal creating a mostly dark atmosphere.

2. What colors are used on the walls?

The walls in the exhibits were white and dark.  The large room with the large displays had white walls while the smaller rooms had darker walls.  The lighting was so dim in the smaller rooms I could not tell exactly what color the walls were only that they were dark in nature. 


3. What materials are used in the interior architecture of the space?

The walls were sheet rock.  The entrance and foyer outside the exhibit was made of marble and had Roman/Greek architectural styling.  The rooms in the exhibit were basically box shaped and had very little detail on the walls.  The rooms were connected so you could access the three main displays all from one area. 


4. How is the movement of the viewer through the gallery space?

When you enter the exhibit it takes a moment to absorb exactly what is going on.  It takes a moment for your senses to acclimate to the environment created by the artist.  Once you absorb the first piece you can see a glimpse of other works through the door ways.  It draws you in.  Once you enter another room with a video display you must wait again and absorb the new environment.  The movement through the exhibit is slow because there is so much to look at and listen to.   

 

Step 3: The Artwork

Questions about the artwork:


1. How are the artworks organized?

      Each artwork has a separate room in which it is displayed.  Some of the smaller videos are shown on Plasma TV’s.  In these rooms two works are displayed.  They have acoustic directing devices so when you stand in front of the work you only hear the sound track that is associated with the work.  The exhibit is comprises of eight rooms broken up into three areas.


2. How are the artworks similar?

      The artworks all are similar in the fact they are all video loops accompanied by sound.  They all are displayed in dark rooms as well. 

3. How are the artworks different?

      Each work has a different theme.  This ranges from planets, to forests, to animals, to fire, to swamps, and the audio is different as well.  Some works are displayed on screens while others are displayed on plasma TV’s. 


4. How are the artworks framed?

      These videos are not framed but displayed on screens.  The screens appeared to be similar to a movie screen at a theater.  The TV’s used were Pioneer brand and could be purchased at a store.  The projectors used are shown in the image below:





5. How are the artworks identified and labeled?

Each work has a placard mounted to the wall.  An accent light is pointed on it so the viewer can read it.  The information cards were mounted about 4 feet off the ground and were typed in bold print.  They were easy to read. 


6. What is the proximity of the artwork to each other?

      The smaller works were placed one or two to a room.  The larger works were placed in a separate room each.  All the works were with in a 100 feet of each other.  The eight works were divided into three areas.  One area had four rooms while the other two areas had two rooms each.

 

Step 4: Art Criticism Exercise

Art Criticism: Describing, Analyzing, and Interpreting Artwork

 

Video Display #1, Mariner 9
 


 
Information Display #1

 




Ø  Description – Describe what you see.  (subject matter)?
 
This display is a video of a foreign planet landscape.  The planet is depicted as Mars.  There is debris from old space missions and some active rovers examining the soil.  

Ø  Formal analysis – (form)  What principles and elements were used and how are they used?

The elements of movement and variety is are here.  The work is 40 or so feet long and there are many different items in the video.  The viewers eye crosses the video screen and from one item to the next. 

Ø  Bracketing - Is there anything in or about this work that reminds you of anything else? Do you see any symbols, metaphors, or allegories?  (iconography) 

This work reminds me of futuristic movies.  The work is intended to portray the future in 200 years. I think the work reminds me of space exploration and the universe.  

Ø  Interpretation - (content)  What do you think the artist was trying to say?  

I think the artist is trying to give us a glimpse of the future.   The artist is showing rovers and not human presence which insinuates that we have not set foot on Mars even in 200 years. 

Video Display #2, The Erudition

 



Information Display #2

 
 

 

Ø  Description – Describe what you see.  (subject matter)?  

This video is a forest scene.  There are pine trees that are very bright.  The pine trees appear and disappear at random.   

Ø  Formal analysis – (form)  What principles and elements were used and how are they used? 

The element of emphasis is used here.  The pine trees are the focal point of the video.  They are very bright and draw the viewers eye to them.  The trees come and go which also brings attention to them.   

Ø  Bracketing - Is there anything in or about this work that reminds you of anything else? Do you see any symbols, metaphors, or allegories?  (iconography) 

This work reminds me of nothing more than what it is.  A forest scene with trees.  The action of the trees however doeas have meaning.
 
Ø  Interpretation - (content)  What do you think the artist was trying to say?  

I think it is possible the artist is representing the destruction of our forest for wood.  The trees are the focal point of the work and they disappear at random.  This could represent the loss of trees through human consumption.

Video Display #3, Leviathan
 
 

 Information Display #3

 
 

 

Ø  Description – Describe what you see.  (subject matter)?  

This video display is a swamp scene.  There are trees and water.  There are also yellow highlights that reflect off the water. 

Ø  Formal analysis – (form)  What principles and elements were used and how are they used? 

The principal of unity is used here.  The water, trees, and moss is found throughout the piece.  These items tie the video scene together.   

Ø  Bracketing - Is there anything in or about this work that reminds you of anything else? Do you see any symbols, metaphors, or allegories?  (iconography)  

This video is simply scene of a swamp that the artist visited. 

Ø  Interpretation - (content)  What do you think the artist was trying to say?  

I think the artist is showing the swamp land as it stands untouched.  The yellow highlights could be the sun or pollution of some sort.  I think the artist was trying to show the viewer the fragile nature of the swamp. 

 

v  Answer this question: What did you think of visiting the Gallery and purposefully looking at the exhibition from a different perspective - the physical space, the architecture, theme, etc.?

I thought the Albright Knox Art Gallery was well laid out but the map did not show where any of the specific exhibits were.   I had to do a bit of searching around to find things.  I enjoyed the visit because I got some time alone with my wife.  I also got to see first hand some of the art that our book showed.  It was interesting that there were no barriers between the viewer and the art at the gallery.  This made the experience more intimate.  By analyzing the Kelly Richardson exhibit through this project I saw things I would have normally over looked.  The lighting, technology, space, movement, and sounds all were seen individually and then as a whole.  This gave me a more in depth perspective on the art and allowed me to fully enjoy it.  I really liked this exhibit and it was easy to become a part of the artwork while viewing it.